The clash of engineering disciplines
Manufacturers have shifted from supplying components to delivering intelligent systems. Initially, engineers added simple software, but growing complexity brought new workflows. Unlike mechanical systems, software needs longer development with frequent updates. The waterfall approach proved ineffective, requiring continuous coordination and synchronisation.
Hybrid project management bridges the gap
Software development favours agility, while mechanical engineering depends on detailed planning. To align processes while maintaining timelines, resources, and risk control, companies must break silos and adopt hybrid project management. This allows teams to use waterfall or agile methods. PMI’s Global Survey shows hybrid adoption rose from 20% in 2020 to 31.5% in 2023—a 57% increase.
There is no one-size-fits-all project management approach. Key questions include the scale of software development and whether to handle it in-house or externally.
Challenges in implementation
Adopting project management software brings challenges:
• Isolated project management across departments
• Inflexible software that cannot adapt to business needs
• Lack of technical expertise
• Poor usability leading to low adoption
• Data security concerns with AI requiring controlled access to sensitive company information
For SMEs, external partners can help ensure a smooth rollout. A leading automotive supplier introduced project management software to streamline operations. Starting with a 50-person engineering team, they focused on task management, IT helpdesk integration, and ERP system automation. Within six months, efficiency gains convinced other teams to join. Today, Easy Redmine supports over 1,000 internal and external staff.
Project management software is not just an operational tool—it is a strategic necessity for digital transformation. To be Industry 4.0-ready, companies must prioritise its implementation at the highest level.